This case blocked imprisonment of Asians who had been approved for the documents needed to work in this country before leaving the country to return here to work, again and this law became one of a group of laws that began to change the racial rules that stopped many from entering the country to work. The new law stated that…<br>(2) Whatever power Congress may have to prohibit the immigration of other foreign citizens or subjects, it had none to prohibit the return to this country of the appellant. He had a vested right to return, which could not be taken from him by any exercise of mere legislative power. (a) That he had a lawful right to be in the United States when the writ issued cannot be denied. He had been a peaceable resident of California for twelve years proceeding June 2d, 1887. He had come here under a treaty between the United States and his own nation, which declared "the inherent and inalienable right of man to change his home and allegiance, and also the .mutual advantage of the free migration and immigration of their citizens and subjects respectively from the one country to the other for purposes of curiosity, of trade, or as permanent residents" Burlingame Treaty, Art. OPINION: No wonder there are so many taxes today when they just kept writing laws that they felt would stop a race of people from coming here to work when they were invited to come.
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female Posts: 155 Location: Brooklyn, New York
Re: CHAE CHAN PING V US « Reply #1 on Nov 4, 2003, 6:40pm »
Chae Chan Ping
Chae Chan Ping is related to our big question for the year because he’s a vivid example of how people are discriminated and oppressed. He was coming back from Hong Kong on September 7th 1888 where he was topped from landing on California because he didn’t have the correct papers. As it turns out that congress made an act that got approve on October 1, 1888 which didn’t let Chinese laborers get back into the U.S. after going out. Also Chae Chen Ping’s certificate was terminated because of the fact that he was a Chinese laborer. http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/6149780.htm
Re: CHAE CHAN PING V US « Reply #2 on Nov 4, 2003, 7:02pm »
Chae Chan Ping v. US source from: http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Chae/ 1889-Chae Chan Ping went back to Hong Kong, then he sailed to California again. In San-Francisco, he showed the custom-house officers his certificate and he wanted to be able to stay in America. They refused his permit because of the Act in 1888 excluding Chinese laborers from the United States. This is related to the big question because the Act shows discrimination to the Chinese, Chae Chan Ping had a permit to allow him to return to the United States, but when he returned, they didn't accept it, I think that shows oppression.
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female Posts: 32 Location: wat???!!
Re: CHAE CHAN PING V US « Reply #3 on Nov 4, 2003, 8:44pm »
The site i used was: http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Chae/ Chae Chan Ping was a chiens man who went back to his homeland, Hong Kong. He wanted to come back to California, but when he got there they wouldnt let him go because of a law named "the Burlingame act". He had all his papers and showed them to the people, but it still didnt work. This is related to our big question because it shows how chiense have been discrimianted, just because thye are chiens, and the white people made so many laws and rules to make the chinese go away from America. The white people were very racist and because of that hey tried to do anythign they can even to get one chinese person out of America. It also shows that there were lots of intolerance performed by the whites. Like when they were making the laws, when they didnt let the chinese be testify in court.
Re: CHAE CHAN PING V US « Reply #4 on Nov 4, 2003, 9:31pm »
1889, california - Chae Chan Ping was imported from Hong Kong to California. He wanted to stay in california but couldn't because of the "chinese exclusion Act" in 1888. The act was saying that no chinese immigrant could longer come to America until 10 years after. Chae Chan Ping had all the certificates and everything but they still wouldn't accept him.
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female Posts: 221 Location: dA BiG aPpLe
Re: CHAE CHAN PING V US « Reply #5 on Nov 5, 2003, 4:09pm »
Chae Chan Ping is a chinese that had went to china for a visit. With him is a paper saying he is allowed back in to the united states. however, when he came back, he was still not allowed in because of the Chinese exclusion act. The paper was useless.
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Male Posts: 177 Location: New York
Re: CHAE CHAN PING V US « Reply #6 on Nov 6, 2003, 10:43pm »
Chae Chan Ping was a man who went to china to visit his parents and he when he came ack he couldnwet ack in to america because they had a law hat prevented chinese people to go to america while he wasgone
Re: CHAE CHAN PING V US « Reply #7 on Nov 12, 2003, 11:53am »
An immigrant that had made it to America, by the name of Chae Chan Ping, wanted to go back to Americadue to the Chinese Exclusion Act. Although he had a legal certificate that allowed him back into America, he was still not allowed to go back in. This is an act of discrimination, tht is why it is related to the big question.